@Stefan. I wouldn't worry about the taking the blame, you've done plenty to help out and there is no way to catch everything. We'll learn as we go.
As svnpub is the only option and since we can't run the binary version that uses ASP.NET, we'll need to probably take your suggestion commit the smaller chunks of html then. I'll do it manually this time and see if I can't write a script that automates it in the future. @Chris, thanks for the fixes to the build scripts this weekend. - Michael On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > On 2011-11-07, Michael Herndon wrote: > > > I can rebuild it, but the trick is replacing the version of it in svn so > > that it does not cause svnsync and cms to choke. Last time I just pushed > it > > into branch/site/docs. However, that is not publicly visible for the > > incubation website, so Prescott had to do an svn move. > > When I recommended to do the svn move I didn't realize we were talking > about that many files. I simply didn't check, sorry. > > > I'm not quite sure how to go about it this time around. I would push it > to > > jira, but it caps uploads at 10 mb. > > Then it still had to go to svn in some way. > > Personally I'm not a friend of generated documents in svn but I'm in a > minority here. > > With svnpubsub being your only option I think the only thing you can do > is split the commit into smaller chunks, committing 100 or 200 files at > a time. Maybe infra has better ideas than that, I don't. > > Stefan >
