[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13150624#comment-13150624
]
Jesse Glick commented on LUCENE-3567:
-------------------------------------
Various application threads could call Maven Indexer methods but they should in
all cases be using an exclusive lock to prevent race conditions. I do not
believe Maven Indexer itself would be accessing Lucene from multiple threads.
In other words, the application is not _intentionally_ using multithreaded
index access. It is possible that it is doing so accidentally. Unfortunately
the low-level {{NullPointerException}} produced deep in the Lucene stack does
not indicate whether this or something else is the problem, nor does the stack
trace point toward a clear diagnosis since the searcher might have been
rendered invalid earlier. It would be nice to have more thorough assertions in
Lucene code, for example verifying in entry points like {{Searcher.search}}
that all related objects are in a valid state, or even tracking which
{{Thread}} is actively mutating state so that definitely inappropriate calls
fail early and reproducibly. Assuming Java {{assert}} is used, this would add
no runtime overhead for production code.
> NPE from SegmentTermDocs.<init> from SegmentReader.termDocs
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3567
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3567
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core/index
> Affects Versions: 3.0.3
> Environment: various OS and JRE combos:
> http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/detail.do?id=180686
> Reporter: Jesse Glick
>
> Occasionally NetBeans IDE users receive an NPE from Lucene 3.0.3 inside Maven
> Indexer (currently 4.1.2) code:
> {code}
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> at
> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentTermDocs.<init>(SegmentTermDocs.java:52)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentReader.termDocs(SegmentReader.java:963)
> at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader.termDocs(IndexReader.java:813)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentReader.termDocs(SegmentReader.java:956)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.search.TermQuery$TermWeight.scorer(TermQuery.java:74)
> at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:210)
> at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:170)
> at org.apache.lucene.search.Searcher.search(Searcher.java:98)
> at org.apache.lucene.search.Searcher.search(Searcher.java:108)
> at
> org.apache.maven.index.DefaultIndexerEngine.getOldDocument(DefaultIndexerEngine.java:158)
> ....
> {code}
> Working backwards, {{parent.core.getTermsReader()}} is null, which means
> {{SegmentReaders.CoreReaders.decRef}} was called, which means
> {{SegmentReader.doClose}} was called, which means {{IndexReader.doClose}} was
> called, which I suppose means something called {{IndexReader.decRef}}
> prematurely. But plenty of things can call {{IndexReader.decRef}} and it is
> not clear how to track down the root cause.
> Note that {{SegmentReader.termDocs}} first calls {{ensureOpen()}}, which is
> presumably supposed to ensure that {{decRef}} had not been called too many
> times; perhaps this assertion did not work?
> Downstream bug, for reference:
> https://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201057
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]