[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13150624#comment-13150624
 ] 

Jesse Glick commented on LUCENE-3567:
-------------------------------------

Various application threads could call Maven Indexer methods but they should in 
all cases be using an exclusive lock to prevent race conditions. I do not 
believe Maven Indexer itself would be accessing Lucene from multiple threads. 
In other words, the application is not _intentionally_ using multithreaded 
index access. It is possible that it is doing so accidentally. Unfortunately 
the low-level {{NullPointerException}} produced deep in the Lucene stack does 
not indicate whether this or something else is the problem, nor does the stack 
trace point toward a clear diagnosis since the searcher might have been 
rendered invalid earlier. It would be nice to have more thorough assertions in 
Lucene code, for example verifying in entry points like {{Searcher.search}} 
that all related objects are in a valid state, or even tracking which 
{{Thread}} is actively mutating state so that definitely inappropriate calls 
fail early and reproducibly. Assuming Java {{assert}} is used, this would add 
no runtime overhead for production code.
                
> NPE from SegmentTermDocs.<init> from SegmentReader.termDocs
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3567
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3567
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core/index
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.3
>         Environment: various OS and JRE combos: 
> http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/detail.do?id=180686
>            Reporter: Jesse Glick
>
> Occasionally NetBeans IDE users receive an NPE from Lucene 3.0.3 inside Maven 
> Indexer (currently 4.1.2) code:
> {code}
> java.lang.NullPointerException
>       at 
> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentTermDocs.<init>(SegmentTermDocs.java:52)
>       at 
> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentReader.termDocs(SegmentReader.java:963)
>       at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader.termDocs(IndexReader.java:813)
>       at 
> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentReader.termDocs(SegmentReader.java:956)
>       at 
> org.apache.lucene.search.TermQuery$TermWeight.scorer(TermQuery.java:74)
>       at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:210)
>       at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:170)
>       at org.apache.lucene.search.Searcher.search(Searcher.java:98)
>       at org.apache.lucene.search.Searcher.search(Searcher.java:108)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.index.DefaultIndexerEngine.getOldDocument(DefaultIndexerEngine.java:158)
>         ....
> {code}
> Working backwards, {{parent.core.getTermsReader()}} is null, which means 
> {{SegmentReaders.CoreReaders.decRef}} was called, which means 
> {{SegmentReader.doClose}} was called, which means {{IndexReader.doClose}} was 
> called, which I suppose means something called {{IndexReader.decRef}} 
> prematurely. But plenty of things can call {{IndexReader.decRef}} and it is 
> not clear how to track down the root cause.
> Note that {{SegmentReader.termDocs}} first calls {{ensureOpen()}}, which is 
> presumably supposed to ensure that {{decRef}} had not been called too many 
> times; perhaps this assertion did not work?
> Downstream bug, for reference: 
> https://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201057

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to