[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13158760#comment-13158760
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3607:
--------------------------------------------

This hasn't yet been fixed... when Lucene makes a new index, it sets the 
"version" field in SegmentInfos to System.currentTimeMillis().

The comment says this:
{noformat}
  /**
   * counts how often the index has been changed by adding or deleting docs.
   * starting with the current time in milliseconds forces to create unique 
version numbers.
   */
{noformat}

But... I don't see why we need unique version numbers across different indices. 
 I don't think we advertise (nor, should) that the version number you get out 
of IR is comparable across indices created anew... so I think we can change 
this to set initial version to 0 instead.
                
> Lucene Index files can not be reproduced faithfully (due to timestamps 
> embedded)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3607
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3607
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core/index
>    Affects Versions: 2.9.1
>         Environment: Eclipse 3.7
>            Reporter: Martin Oberhuber
>
> Eclipse 3.7 uses Lucene 2.9.1 for indexing online help content. A 
> pre-generated help index can be shipped together with online content. As per
>    [[https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=364979 ]]
> it turns out that the help index can not be faithfully reproduced during a 
> build, because there are timestamps embedded in the index files, and the 
> "NameCounter" field in segments_2 contains different contents on every build.
> Not being able to faithfully reproduce the index from identical source bits 
> undermines trust in the index (and software delivery) being correct.
> I'm wondering whether this is a known issue and/or has been addressed in a 
> newer Lucene version already ?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to