@Uwe
just teasing, but I *do* test with Java 1.5 thanks to you!

@Martijn
I've got fixes ready to check in, just running through full test now.
I'll attach the current version to the bug (SOLR-2975) for your
perusal. I tried changing things to use List<Map<String, Object>> but
couldn't get that to work with the multivalued test so put in a method
to compare things as maps. You'll see in the patch.....

Erick

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Martijn v Groningen
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for noticing this! I should have checked the tests better
> before I committed this! I also get random failures here running the
> test with -Dtests.iter:
> ant test -Dtestcase=TestSolrEntityProcessorUnit -Dtests.iter=1000
>
> I'll also take a look at it.
>
> Martijn
>
> On 16 December 2011 13:51, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Erick, as Hoss said, the test is buggy. It makes assumtions that the
>> EntrySet of a map is order. This is not the case, a Set by definition is
>> unsorted. So the test is buggy and luckily you investigated the bug.
>>
>> -----
>> Uwe Schindler
>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Erick Erickson [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 1:41 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: local 3x test failure
>>>
>>> See? After Uwe made me paranoid by finding the screw-up where I checked
>>> code in that didn't even compile under 1.5 I started getting more thorough
>> with
>>> using 1.5. Lucky me.
>>>
>>> So, can we stop developing 3.x sometime real soon now and make my life
>>> easier? <G>
>>>
>>> Anyway, I'll take care of this today.
>>>
>>> Erick
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Steven A Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > Oh, and the reason Jenkins isn't seeing this failure is that it runs
>> branch_3x
>>> tests using Java 1.6, after first *compiling* with Java 1.5.
>>> >
>>> >> -----Original Message-----
>>> >> From: Steven A Rowe [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> >> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 11:45 PM
>>> >> To: [email protected]
>>> >> Subject: RE: local 3x test failure
>>> >>
>>> >> FYI, I see this same failure when I run the branch_3x tests with Java
>>> >> 1.5, but not 1.6.
>>> >>
>>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>>> >> > From: Erick Erickson [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> >> > Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 9:52 PM
>>> >> > To: [email protected]
>>> >> > Subject: local 3x test failure
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I'm consistently getting the error below when running tests,
>>> >> > updated checkout of Solr 3x, no changes to the code.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Note, in my case, it isn't necessary to specify the seed at all,
>>> >> > "ant test -Dtestcase=TestSolrEntityProcessorUnit" fails all by
>> itself.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Looking at the test code, it *appears* to be an ordering problem.
>>> >> > This bit of code (lines 119+
>>> >> > TestSolrEntityProcessorUnit.testMultiThread)
>>> >> > is throwing the error:
>>> >> >       for (Entry<String,Object> entry : row.entrySet()) {
>>> >> >         assertEquals(expectedDoc[i][0], entry.getKey());
>>> >> >         assertEquals(expectedDoc[i][1], entry.getValue());
>>> >> >         i++;
>>> >> >       }
>>> >> >
>>> >> > All the values are there, just not ordered that way. If I change
>>> >> > the asserts to:
>>> >> >         assertEquals(expectedDoc[(i+1)%2][0], entry.getKey());
>>> >> >         assertEquals(expectedDoc[(i+1)%2][1], entry.getValue());
>>> >> >
>>> >> > it works just fine. I'm not in the least proposing this as a fix
>>> >> > for tolerably obvious reasons, but if someone wants to look at this
>>> >> > I figure it's good data to have.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > And I'm perplexed why this isn't  apparently happening on the build
>>> >> > machine....
>>> >> >
>>> >> > And it's late enough in the evening that I don't dare change the
>>> >> > code, especially for fear that this has something to do with my
>>> >> > environment.....
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Erick
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Java version:
>>> >> > java version "1.5.0_30"
>>> >> > Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
>>> >> > 1.5.0_30-b03-389-10M3527)
>>> >> > Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_30-161, mixed mode,
>>> >> > sharing)
>>> >> >
>>> >> >  [junit] ------------- Standard Error -----------------
>>> >> >     [junit] NOTE: reproduce with: ant test
>>> >> > -Dtestcase=TestSolrEntityProcessorUnit -Dtestmethod=testMultiThread
>>> >> > -Dtests.seed=7d8b82edcf5e7451:-3e7338fa530fae6d:-12dd2d3d55b3edde
>>> >> > -Dargs="-Dfile.encoding=MacRoman"
>>> >> >     [junit] WARNING: test class left thread running:
>>> >> > Thread[pool-1-thread-1,5,main]
>>> >> >     [junit] WARNING: test class left thread running:
>>> >> > Thread[pool-2-thread-1,5,main]
>>> >> >     [junit] WARNING: test class left thread running:
>>> >> > Thread[pool-3-thread-1,5,main]
>>> >> >     [junit] WARNING: test class left thread running:
>>> >> > Thread[pool-4-thread-1,5,main]
>>> >> >     [junit] WARNING: test class left thread running:
>>> >> > Thread[pool-5-thread-1,5,main]
>>> >> >     [junit] RESOURCE LEAK: test class left 5 thread(s) running
>>> >> >     [junit] NOTE: test params are: locale=no,
>>> >> > timezone=Europe/Samara
>>> >> >     [junit] NOTE: all tests run in this JVM:
>>> >> >     [junit] [TestSolrEntityProcessorUnit]
>>> >> >     [junit] NOTE: Mac OS X 10.6.8 i386/Apple Inc. 1.5.0_30
>>> >> > (32-bit)/cpus=2,threads=1,free=509856,total=2031616
>>> >> >     [junit] ------------- ---------------- ---------------
>>> >> >     [junit] Testcase:
>>> >> >
>>> >> testMultiThread(org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.TestSolrEntityProc
>>> >> essor
>>> >> > Unit):      FAILED
>>> >> >     [junit] expected:<[id]> but was:<[description]>
>>> >> >     [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<[id]>
>>> >> > but was:<[description]>
>>> >> >     [junit]         at
>>> >> >
>>> >> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.TestSolrEntityProcessorUnit.testMu
>>> >> ltiTh
>>> >> > read(TestSolrEntityProcessorUnit.java:120)
>>> >> >     [junit]         at
>>> >> >
>>> >> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$2$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.jav
>>> >> a:432
>>> >> > )
>>> >> >     [junit]         at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.
>>> >> > java:147)
>>> >> >     [junit]         at
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.
>>> >> > java:50)
>>> >> >
>>> >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For
>>> >> > additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional
>>> commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Met vriendelijke groet,
>
> Martijn van Groningen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to