Dan, JIRA is open for everyone, you don't need to submit a patch. It's really helpful if you just submit the feature request. Then others can step in to do the coding, but you will be registered as the reporter, i.e. the one having a need for the feature.
-- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com On 17. des. 2011, at 15:01, [email protected] wrote: > Jan, > > Would be glad to open a JIRA issue, but I'm a U/X architect not a Java > developer, so wouldn't be able to patch anything. > > Dan > > On 12/16/11 6:05 PM, Jan Høydahl wrote: >> Dan, >> >> I'm sure it is possible. Perhaps it should even be possible to combine fixed >> column positions and wildcard, by fl=fieldA,fieldB,* to "lock" the named >> fields as first columns followed by a (sorted) list of the rest of the >> fields. >> >> Anyway, the first step is for you to create a JIRA issue and next step is to >> contribute a patch. See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute >> >> -- >> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >> Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com >> >> On 16. des. 2011, at 22:27, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> Another useful addition would be to add a csv sort parameter if requesting >>> all (*) fields -- a way to control the field order on export. >>> >>> E.g. >>> >>> &wt=csv&fl=*&csv.fl.sort=alpha asc >>> >>> I've had cases where: >>> >>> a) I'm returning too many fields to explicitly define >>> fl=field_J,field_Z,field_A,etc. >>> >>> b) WANTED all the fields returned (a great way to dump data to a >>> spreadsheet) >>> >>> but wanted a more orderly csv field structure than the one returned. >>> >>> Is this possible? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> >>> >>> On 12/16/11 3:02 AM, Jan Høydahl (Commented) (JIRA) wrote: >>>> [ >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13170876#comment-13170876 >>>> ] >>>> >>>> Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-2970: >>>> ----------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Created SOLR-2974 for B) >>>> >>>> I see that today you can explicitly specify non-existing fields in >>>> field-list and they will all end up in the response, >>>> e.g.&wt=csv&fl=id,type,foo,nonexisting >>>> >>>> If this is useful in some cases then let's continue to support it - >>>> coupled with the improvement in SOLR-2974 >>>> But the default case when "fl" is not specified, or specified as "*", CSV >>>> writer should output only the stored fields. >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
