[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13182329#comment-13182329 ]
Martijn van Groningen commented on LUCENE-3602: ----------------------------------------------- bq. But I think the first 2 passes could be combined? That idea also crossed my mind. We should definitely do this. bq Also, instead of making a toplevel bit set as the return result... could it be an ordinary filter? I like that approach. It can just return a TermsFilter instance, right? Maybe we should have to variants one returns a MTQ and one a TermsFilter? So users can choose whether to want a filter or a query. > Add join query to Lucene > ------------------------ > > Key: LUCENE-3602 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3602 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: modules/join > Reporter: Martijn van Groningen > Attachments: LUCENE-3602.patch, LUCENE-3602.patch, LUCENE-3602.patch > > > Solr has (psuedo) join query for a while now. I think this should also be > available in Lucene. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org