[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13189572#comment-13189572
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-2753:
-------------------------------------
Any thoughts or discussion on how this should happen? One big question is what
are the naming requirements -- lucene lets you have a regular field with name
'author' and a DocValues field with the same name.
- the name overlap may be useful
- it would also complicate how we refer to fields
Does it make sense to represent DocValues with SchemaField? Some of the
attributes could make sense (defaultValue, required, etc) but many do not
(INDEXED/TOKENIZED) etc. Do we need/want a new class hierarchy?
>From the end user perspective, it would be great if you don't have to do
>anything special if the field is DocValues or regular.
> support CSF (IndexDocValues)
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-2753
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2753
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Yonik Seeley
> Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> Solr needs support for CSF/IndexDocValues
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
