[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13196594#comment-13196594 ]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-3073: -------------------------------- bq. If not, then UUIDField itself should be fixed to not return a UUID from toObject. Wouldn't that defeat the entire point of toObject? ... I thought the whole purpose was to give more robust response writers like JavaBin access to the best possible representation of hte values, even if they weren't "simple" (ie: strings, ints, etc...) so writers that can handle complex types can use complex types. if grouping just needs the string representation of hte unique key field then that's what toExternal is for. > Distributed Grouping fails if the uniqueKey is a UUID > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-3073 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3073 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 3.5 > Reporter: Devon Krisman > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 3.6 > > Attachments: SOLR-3073-3x.patch, SOLR-3073-3x.patch > > > Attempting to use distributed grouping (using a StrField as the > group.fieldname) with a UUID as the uniqueKey results in an error because the > classname (java.util.UUID) is prepended to the field value during the second > phase of the grouping. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org