[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13199636#comment-13199636
]
Tomás Fernández Löbbe edited comment on SOLR-3026 at 2/3/12 10:52 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the default should be uf=\*, otherwise it will be confusing. I think
"field" search together with "dismax" search will be one of the main reasons
why people will move from other QP to edismax, and with uf=\-\* they will not
get that behavior until they explicitly change it. I bet that if we use uf=\-\*
we'll get many questions related to this in the mailing list.
About the optimization, I think its a good idea, however it should be a
different Jira. The optimization could be applied to f.who.qf as well as to qf=
right?
was (Author: tomasflobbe):
I think the default should be uf=\*, otherwise it will be confusing. I
think "field" search together with "dismax" search will be one of the main
reasons why people will move from other QP to edismax, and with uf=-\* they
will not get that behavior until they explicitly change it. I bet that if we
use uf=-\* we'll get many questions related to this in the mailing list.
About the optimization, I think its a good idea, however it should be a
different Jira. The optimization could be applied to f.who.qf as well as to qf=
right?
> eDismax: Locking down which fields can be explicitly queried (user fields aka
> uf)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3026
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3026
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
> Affects Versions: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5
> Reporter: Jan Høydahl
> Assignee: Jan Høydahl
> Fix For: 3.6, 4.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-3026.patch, SOLR-3026.patch, SOLR-3026.patch,
> SOLR-3026.patch, SOLR-3026.patch, SOLR-3026.patch, SOLR-3026.patch
>
>
> We need a way to specify exactly what fields should be available to the end
> user as fielded search.
> In the original SOLR-1553, there's a patch implementing "user fields", but it
> was never committed even if that issue was closed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
