thanks for all the work grant! simon
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Paul Doscher <[email protected]> wrote: > Congratulations.. Much nice, cleaner look and feel.. > Thanks > > Paul > > Paul Doscher > Chief Executive Officer > Lucid Imagination, Inc > 650 353 4057 x 114 > [email protected] > www.lucidimagination.com > > From: Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> > Reply-To: <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:46:08 -0500 > > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New Website > > We are now live! > > http://lucene.apache.org/ > > > > On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > I increased the font size and made it darker. I also updated the tutorial. > Time for me to do other things until this weekend when I'm going to cut > over, so if you have stuff you don't like before we cut over, see > instructions below. This weekend, I will bring in the old versioned docs as > well as port over the .htaccess stuff and add in redirects for the > lucene/java stuff to be lucene/core. > > If someone could update the news to be current, that would be much > appreciated. > > > On Feb 1, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > > Ahem! Are we talking "over 40 fonts" here? It's a sad fact that I've > been noticing > over the last few years that the screen is getting harder to read... Living > long > enough to have that problem beats the alternative though... > > Erick > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Walter Underwood <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Feb 1, 2012, at 4:14 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: > > > the text I see (tried 3 browsers) is a bit Gray (or faded), and I rather > > read a page with more contrast between the text and the background, more > > clear to my eyes this way, but this is just my personal preference, it seems > > others do not feel that way, so I'm okay with this. Hopefully this is more > > clear now? > > > > I agree. The body text is tiny and low contrast. Poor accessibility for > > anyone with low vision, including normal aging. > > > Compare to the current site, which isn't large body text by any measure, but > > is bigger and full-contrast. > > > Personally, I'd go with a serif font, but that is mostly preference. > > Letterforms are more differentiated with serifs, so it is just less work to > > read. > > > wunder > > -- > > Walter Underwood > > [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > -------------------------------------------- > Grant Ingersoll > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > > > > -------------------------------------------- > Grant Ingersoll > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
