I think that's a popular and superior model - committers have access and users can leave comments. If that means we start making committers out of heavy doc helpers, that seems like a plus to me.
On Feb 9, 2012, at 3:48 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Feb 8, 2012, at 7:35 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > >> We should also consider having part of the wiki "committers only" (or >> others that we decide to give access). Just as with our code >> development, it doesn't always make sense to completely crowd-source >> documentation. > > I could see that we move "official docs" to the CMS and leave the wiki for > new things, etc. and for user generated recipes, etc. > > I'm having a discussion on site-dev@ about how we might be able to > incorporate some type of commenting system (disqus, perhaps) into the CMS so > that we can have people comment on CMS pages -- assuming we put up a more > coherent ref. guide there. > >> >> -Yonik >> lucidimagination.com >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Yonik Seeley <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Ryan had started on it some time ago, but was never completed. >>> >>> I thought that was maybe for the website, but not the wiki (I don't >>> think we have a wiki space created yet?) >>> >>>> FWIW, I also think we should think about re-organizing some of our docs so >>>> that it is easier for beginners >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> Specific to Solr, I think we should drop all the "back compat" in our >>> documentation and target it toward 4.0 >>> >>> -Yonik >>> lucidimagination.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > -------------------------------------------- > Grant Ingersoll > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > >
