[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13205126#comment-13205126
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2802:
-----------------------------------
{quote}
but failing hard is definitely better – at least by default.
{quote}
Thanks, I think this makes it a lot less scary!
{quote}
UpdateProcessors deal with SolrInputDocuments & SolrInputFields that are just
bags of objects
{quote}
ok, looking around I can see this is a larger type-safety issue that shouldn't
be addressed
on this issue.
Thanks for fixing the change (and fixing the eclipse compile).
> Toolkit of UpdateProcessors for modifying document values
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-2802
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2802
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Hoss Man
> Assignee: Hoss Man
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-2802_update_processor_toolkit.patch,
> SOLR-2802_update_processor_toolkit.patch,
> SOLR-2802_update_processor_toolkit.patch,
> SOLR-2802_update_processor_toolkit.patch,
> SOLR-2802_update_processor_toolkit.patch
>
>
> Frequently users ask about questions about things where the answer is "you
> could do it with an UpdateProcessor" but the number of our of hte box
> UpdateProcessors is generally lacking and there aren't even very good base
> classes for the common case of manipulating field values when adding documents
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
