[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13205494#comment-13205494
 ] 

Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3762:
-------------------------------------

This already works on the branch I think, but I will re-check. I advanced 
junit4 branch and integrated junit4 parallel balanced runner instead of the 
default ANT's junit and previous set of macros. The code for this patch lives 
under LUCENE-3762.

I'll look for corner cases tonight and commit this in. Alternatively we could 
set up a parallel jenkins build and commit this on a branch to see if 
everything is all right?
                
> Upgrade JUnit to 4.10, refactor state-machine of detecting setUp/tearDown 
> call chaining.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3762
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3762
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Dawid Weiss
>            Assignee: Dawid Weiss
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 3.6, 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3762.patch, LUCENE-3762.patch
>
>
> Both Lucene and Solr use JUnit 4.7. I suggest we move forward and upgrade to 
> JUnit 4.10 which provides several infrastructural changes (serializable 
> Description objects, class-level rules, various tweaks). JUnit 4.10 also 
> changes (or fixes, depends how you look at it) the order in which 
> @Before/@After hooks and @Rules are applied. This makes the old state-machine 
> in LuceneTestCase fail (because the order is changed).
> I rewrote the state machine and used a different, I think simpler, although 
> Uwe may disagree :), mechanism in which the hook methods setUp/ tearDown are 
> still there, but they are empty at the top level and serve only to detect 
> whether subclasses chain super.setUp/tearDown properly (if they override 
> anything).
> In the long term, I would love to just get rid of public setup/teardown 
> methods and make them private (so that they cannot be overriden or even seen 
> by subclasses) but this will require changes to the runner itself.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to