[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13215253#comment-13215253
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-3795:
---------------------------------------
I guess I don't see the problem with having multiple .jar files (aside from the
ant setup effort)
I'm fine with one .jar if we guarantee that the 'base' classes don't have
compile time access to lucene classes. I'm sure there is some ant crazieness
to compile half the project with different classpaths then bundle them
together, but that seems more complex (and less clear) then two .jar files
> Replace spatial contrib module with LSP's spatial-lucene module
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3795
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3795
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: modules/spatial
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> I propose that Lucene's spatial contrib module be replaced with the
> spatial-lucene module within Lucene Spatial Playground (LSP). LSP has been
> in development for approximately 1 year by David Smiley, Ryan McKinley, and
> Chris Male and we feel it is ready. LSP is here:
> http://code.google.com/p/lucene-spatial-playground/ and the spatial-lucene
> module is intuitively in svn/trunk/spatial-lucene/.
> I'll add more comments to prevent the issue description from being too long.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
