[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2445. ---------------------------------------- Resolution: Won't Fix We removed bulk API in 4.0. > Perf improvements for the DocsEnum bulk read API > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: LUCENE-2445 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2445 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Bug > Components: core/index > Reporter: Michael McCandless > Fix For: 4.0 > > > I started to work on LUCENE-2443, to create a test showing the > problems, but it turns out none of the core codecs (even sep/intblock) > ever set a non-zero offset. > So I set forth to fix sep to do so, but ran into some issues w/ the > current bulk-read API that we should fix to make it higher > performance: > * Filtering of deleted docs should be the caller's job (saves an > extra pass through the docs) > * Probably docs should arrive as deltas and caller sums these up to > get the actual docID > * Whether to load freqs or not should be separately controllable > * We may want to require that the int[] for docs and freqs are > "aligned", ie the offset into each is the same > * Maybe we should separate out a BulkDocsEnum from DocsEnum. We can > make it optional for codecs (ie, we can emulate BulkDocsEnum from > the DocsEnum) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org