[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13233610#comment-13233610
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3887:
-------------------------------------
Christian this looks just like what we need! I like some of the other checks
available on javadocs too.
One bummer is the GPL license, but maybe its ok for us to run this on hudson
nightly as a separate thing somehow?
According to http://ant.apache.org/nightlies.html, they are using checkstyle.
> 'ant javadocs' should fail if a package is missing a package.html
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3887
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3887
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: general/build
> Reporter: Robert Muir
>
> While reviewing the javadocs I noticed many packages are missing a basic
> package.html.
> For 3.x I committed some package.html files where they were missing (I will
> port forward to trunk).
> I think all packages should have this... really all public/protected
> classes/methods/constants,
> but this would be a good step.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
