[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3903: ---------------------------------- Attachment: LUCENE-3903.patch Patch that fixes the issue(s): - Simply append the pretify.css to the one created by javadocs itsself (as post-javadoc-task <concat/>) - Fix javascript issues by Java 7: The code that triggered prettyprint was relying on an implementation specific javascript function name no longer existent in Java 7. I changed the window.onload handler to dynamically append the 2nd handler. > javadocs very very ugly if you generate with java7 > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-3903 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3903 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Bug > Components: general/javadocs > Affects Versions: 3.6, 4.0 > Reporter: Robert Muir > Attachments: LUCENE-3903.patch, java7docs.jpg > > > Java7 changes its javadocs to look much nicer, but this involves different > CSS styles. > Lucene overrides the CSS with stylesheet+prettify.css which is a combination > of java5/6 stylesheet + google prettify: > but there are problems because java7 has totally different styles. > So if you generate javadocs with java7, its like you have no stylesheet at > all. > A solution might be to make stylesheet7+prettify.css and conditionalize a > property in ant based on java version. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org