On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Chris Hostetter > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> : http://www.apache.org/dev/svn-eol-style.txt >> >> There is at least one contradiction i know listed there compared to what >> we have done in the past... >> >> https://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommitterInfo?highlight=%28eol\-style%29#Suggested_Subversion_Configuration_Options >> >> # use LF for shell scrips since even cygwin wants LF >> *.sh = svn:eol-style=LF;svn:keywords=Date Author Id Revision HeadURL >> >> ...is that no longer true for cygwin? >> > > I don't know about that: at least last time i installed cygwin (a > while ago) you could actually choose to configure whether it used LF > or CRLF
I always used LF cygwin myself. Having a CRLF shell script in an LF cygwin tends to break things. Having a LF shell script in a CRLF cygwin still works I think? If so, we should continue using LF for shell scripts. -Yonik lucenerevolution.com - Lucene/Solr Open Source Search Conference. Boston May 7-10 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
