[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13240946#comment-13240946
 ] 

David Smiley commented on SOLR-2724:
------------------------------------

I take issue with the Yonik's comment "we're not really gaining anything with 
this change".  I don't know about you, but I'm always pondering how Solr can 
work better and be easier to understand / configure.  I don't think 
defaultSearchField & defaultOperator have a need to exist, let alone exist in 
schema.xml, thereby creating unnecessary complexity in understanding the 
product -- albeit in a small way.  My work with Erik on simplifying the 
solrconfig.xml is along the same lines with my eventual hope to simply 
eliminate default="true" on a RH and the handleSelect thing.

I do agree that defaultSearchField is more useful than defaultOperator, but 
when it is depended on for some search or another (like the /browse fq=ipod 
example in SOLR-3292) , IMO it would been better/clearer for the query to be 
explicit.
                
> Deprecate defaultSearchField and defaultOperator defined in schema.xml
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-2724
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2724
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Schema and Analysis, search
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Assignee: David Smiley
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.6, 4.0
>
>         Attachments: 
> SOLR-2724_deprecateDefaultSearchField_and_defaultOperator.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 2h
>  Remaining Estimate: 2h
>
> I've always been surprised to see the <defaultSearchField> element and 
> <solrQueryParser defaultOperator="OR"/> defined in the schema.xml file since 
> the first time I saw them.  They just seem out of place to me since they are 
> more query parser related than schema related. But not only are they 
> misplaced, I feel they shouldn't exist. For query parsers, we already have a 
> "df" parameter that works just fine, and explicit field references. And the 
> default lucene query operator should stay at OR -- if a particular query 
> wants different behavior then use q.op or simply use "OR".
> <similarity> Seems like something better placed in solrconfig.xml than in the 
> schema. 
> In my opinion, defaultSearchField and defaultOperator configuration elements 
> should be deprecated in Solr 3.x and removed in Solr 4.  And <similarity> 
> should move to solrconfig.xml. I am willing to do it, provided there is 
> consensus on it of course.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to