[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13240963#comment-13240963
 ] 

David Smiley commented on SOLR-3161:
------------------------------------

As an aside, this default request handler patch should probably have been 
another JIRA issue instead of this JIRA issue including several different 
things including clarifying the default config.

I stupidly committed the patch without testing and it broke the build because 
solr/core/src/test-files/solr/conf/solrconfig.xml (and possibly other test 
configs) has a <requestHandler name="standard"> (with no default="true").  
Either the config(s) should be updated to be "/select" based (which I don't 
mind doing) or I could add back "standard" as eligible for default request 
handler nomination.  I committed the latter now because it's the safest.  
/select should takes precedence.  I also committed a warning message if there 
is none registered:
{code}
    if(get("") == null)
      log.warn("no default request handler is registered (either '/select' or 
'standard')");
{code}
                
> Use of 'qt' should be restricted to searching and should not start with a '/'
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-3161
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3161
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: search, web gui
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Assignee: David Smiley
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-3161-disable-qt-by-default.patch, 
> SOLR-3161-dispatching-request-handler.patch, 
> SOLR-3161-dispatching-request-handler.patch, 
> SOLR-3161_limit_qt=_____to_refer_to_SearchHandlers,_and_shards_qt_likewise.patch,
>  SOLR-3161_make_the_slash-select_request_handler_the_default.patch
>
>
> I haven't yet looked at the code involved for suggestions here; I'm speaking 
> based on how I think things should work and not work, based on intuitiveness 
> and security. In general I feel it is best practice to use '/' leading 
> request handler names and not use "qt", but I don't hate it enough when used 
> in limited (search-only) circumstances to propose its demise. But if someone 
> proposes its deprecation that then I am +1 for that.
> Here is my proposal:
> Solr should error if the parameter "qt" is supplied with a leading '/'. 
> (trunk only)
> Solr should only honor "qt" if the target request handler extends 
> solr.SearchHandler.
> The new admin UI should only use 'qt' when it has to. For the query screen, 
> it could present a little pop-up menu of handlers to choose from, including 
> "/select?qt=mycustom" for handlers that aren't named with a leading '/'. This 
> choice should be positioned at the top.
> And before I forget, me or someone should investigate if there are any 
> similar security problems with the shards.qt parameter. Perhaps shards.qt can 
> abide by the same rules outlined above.
> Does anyone foresee any problems with this proposal?
> On a related subject, I think the notion of a default request handler is bad 
> - the default="true" thing. Honestly I'm not sure what it does, since I 
> noticed Solr trunk redirects '/solr/' to the new admin UI at '/solr/#/'. 
> Assuming it doesn't do anything useful anymore, I think it would be clearer 
> to use <requestHandler name="/select" class="solr.SearchHandler"> instead of 
> what's there now. The delta is to put the leading '/' on this request handler 
> name, and remove the "default" attribute.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to