We should maybe add a utility method in lucene.util package (core), because
this is also often needed in Lucene core. Lots of code simply wraps needless by
RuntimeException. A good rethrow method should check with 2 instanceof checks
the rethrowable Exceptions and otherwise wrap with RuntimeEx:
static void rethrowUnchecked(Throwable t) {
if (t instanceof RuntimeException)
throw (RuntimeException) t;
if (t instanceof Error)
throw (Error) t;
throw new RuntimeException(t);
}
These 2 instanceof checks catch all unchecked Exceptions, often the "Error"
case is missing.
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 5:26 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 12905 - Failure
>
> oh, i think i know the problem.
>
> the 'help' basetokenstream gives here, that steve mentions, causes the
> problem.
> I bet it catches and rethrows Throwable or something wrapped in a
> RuntimeException?
> But if its an assumptionViolatedException... it should ensure it doesnt wrap
> it!
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Dawid Weiss
> <dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl> wrote:
> > This looks like a re-thrown (wrapped) failed assumption. Don't know
> > the logic of that test -- maybe it should be an assumption?
> >
> > Dawid
> >
> > Caused by: org.junit.internal.AssumptionViolatedException: failed
> > assumption: Test data cannot contain '\uFFFF' (Lucene 3.x only)
> > at
> > org.apache.lucene.analysis.MockTokenizer.readCodePoint(MockTokenizer.j
> > ava:136)
> > at
> > org.apache.lucene.analysis.MockTokenizer.incrementToken(MockTokenizer.
> > java:111)
> > at
> > org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkAnalysisConsis
> > tency(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:427)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(Bas
> > eTokenStreamTestCase.java:395)
> >
> > Dawid
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I think this could be bogus? Looks from a stacktrace its failing on
> >> an
> >> assume() from another thread?
> >>
> >> You fixed this... but maybe we lost it in some cleanup?
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Steven A Rowe <sar...@syr.edu>
> wrote:
> >>> I can reproduce this locally - I'm
> digging. BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData() prints to standard
> error:
> >>>
> >>> [junit] TEST FAIL: useCharFilter=true text='\"ÿ'
> >>>
> >>> which is fantastic - very easy to see where to focus the search for
> problems.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks Robert, Mike, and Dawid for all your work beefing up test
> >>> facilities.
> >>>
> >>> Steve
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Apache Jenkins Server [mailto:jenk...@builds.apache.org]
> >>> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:18 AM
> >>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> >>> Subject: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 12905 -
> >>> Failure
> >>>
> >>> Build:
> >>> https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/12905/
> >>>
> >>> 1 tests failed.
> >>> REGRESSION:
> >>> org.apache.lucene.analysis.charfilter.HTMLStripCharFilterTest.testRa
> >>> ndom
> >>>
> >>> Error Message:
> >>> Uncaught exception by thread: Thread[Thread-8,5,]
> >>>
> >>> Stack Trace:
> >>> org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$UncaughtExceptionsInBa
> >>> ckgroundThread: Uncaught exception by thread: Thread[Thread-8,5,]
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExc
> >>> eptionsRule.java:83)
> >>> at
> >>>
> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SaveThreadAndTestNameRule$1.ev
> >>> aluate(LuceneTestCase.java:508)
> >>> at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:18)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRu
> >>> nner.java:68)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseR
> >>> unner.java:146)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseR
> >>> unner.java:50)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores
> >>> .java:28)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.j
> >>> ava:30)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExc
> >>> eptionsRule.java:74)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameR
> >>> ule.java:36)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(Syst
> >>> emPropertiesInvariantRule.java:67)
> >>> at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:18)
> >>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
> >>> at
> >>> junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter.run(JUnit4TestAdapter.java:39)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.run(JUn
> >>> itTestRunner.java:420)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.launch(
> >>> JUnitTestRunner.java:911)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JU
> >>> nitTestRunner.java:743) Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException:
> >>> org.junit.internal.AssumptionViolatedException: failed assumption:
> >>> Test data cannot contain '\uFFFF' (Lucene 3.x only)
> >>> at
> >>>
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(B
> >>> aseTokenStreamTestCase.java:398)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.access$000(BaseTo
> >>> kenStreamTestCase.java:50)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase$AnalysisThread.ru
> >>> n(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:336)
> >>> Caused by: org.junit.internal.AssumptionViolatedException: failed
> >>> assumption: Test data cannot contain '\uFFFF' (Lucene 3.x only)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.lucene.analysis.MockTokenizer.readCodePoint(MockTokenizer
> >>> .java:136)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.lucene.analysis.MockTokenizer.incrementToken(MockTokenize
> >>> r.java:111)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkAnalysisCons
> >>> istency(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:427)
> >>> at
> >>>
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(B
> >>> aseTokenStreamTestCase.java:395)
> >>> ... 2 more
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Build Log (for compile errors):
> >>> [...truncated 11422 lines...]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> lucidimagination.com
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For
> >> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For
> > additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> lucidimagination.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional
> commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
