bq. Exploits a weakness in the runtime to throw an arbitrary throwable without the traditional declaration.
This is hardly a weakness; it's part of the JVM spec (or rather: the distinction of checked/ unchecked is part of the Java specification not the JVM specification). > But it's in my opinion a generics bug in combination with suppresswarnings It's an exploit of how generics are (under)specified. Many people think checked exceptions are actually a stupid invention, I think it's debatable, some of them are really annoying... Dawid --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
