[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13245551#comment-13245551
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3943:
-------------------------------------
bq. In my opinion, the ideal situation would be that we pass these filesets
directly to the zip/tar/gz whatever in the binary release targets
+1.
> Use ivy cachepath and cachefileset instead of ivy retrieve
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3943
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3943
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: general/build
> Reporter: Chris Male
>
> In LUCENE-3930 we moved to resolving all external dependencies using
> ivy:retrieve. This process places the dependencies into the lib/ folder of
> the respective modules which was ideal since it replicated the existing build
> process and limited the number of changes to be made to the build.
> However it can lead to multiple jars for the same dependency in the lib
> folder when the dependency is upgraded, and just isn't the most efficient way
> to use Ivy.
> Uwe pointed out that _when working from svn or in using src releases_ we can
> remove the ivy:retrieve calls and make use of ivy:cachepath and
> ivy:cachefileset to build our classpaths and packages respectively, which
> will go some way to addressing these limitations -- however we still need the
> build system capable of putting the actual jars into specific lib folders
> when assembling the binary artifacts
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
