Hello again Robert, I've been doing some end-to-end testing on Kuromoji using the release candidate build and things look good to me.
I've also done the testing described on SOLR-3282 earlier using a branch_3x build from last week. That also looks good. I have one legal question: In Lucene's NOTICE.txt we have a MeCab-IPADIC entry, but I can't find a corresponding one in Solr's NOTICE.txt. Is this fine -- or should this also be included as part of the "Lucene notice"? (To me it sounds appropriate to also include this in Solr's NOTICE.txt.) Christian Moen http://www.atilika.com On Apr 6, 2012, at 12:25 AM, Christian Moen wrote: > Robert, > > Great work getting everything ready and reworking the build system as well. > I'll take Kuromoji for a spin and provide feedback tomorrow (Japanese time). > > > Christian > http://www.atilika.com > > On Apr 5, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > >> Please vote to release these artifacts: http://s.apache.org/lusolr36rc0 >> >> I tested with dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py, ran rat-sources >> on both source releases, tested solr example, and reviewed packaging >> contents (http://people.apache.org/~rmuir/36_review/) >> >> Here's my +1. >> >> -- >> lucidimagination.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
