[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13256877#comment-13256877
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3358:
-----------------------------------
Well for one the current structure is really unrelated to maven. When Steve
Rowe and I
first started working on the build, there were other things to fix (core tests
depended on contribs, etc).
So i think its improving, I'm not trying to complain: if we could have fixed
this stuff
safely when transitioning to ivy, we would have. I feel like Chris Male and I
spent an entire
night trying to figure out the best approach: populating the huge lib/ folder
just like before
simple kept the issue scope contained.
Just a few notes about this:
# we don't really need to be downloading jars and putting them in lib/ at all
(LUCENE-3943).
what we have now is a 'transition mechanism' that works like the old build,
but we should
really fix this: then people wont have issues with things like having stale
jars or anything
else: and we avoid copying around or whatever. Still lets put this aside, we
can still improve
things right now (see below)
# i agree with your suggestions, though i think we actually have jetty-test
classes in test-framework?
so i think it should be solrj/lib, core/lib, test-framework/lib, etc (don't
try to tackle the lib-test
initially, i think we should attack 'separation' first).
# after accomplishing #2 above, we can then start to think about alternative
configurations,
and whether or not we even want to try to do that before fixing #1. Fixing #1
would make this task
much simpler and cleaner. i don't think we should have a separate lib/ with
jetty7 and example with jetty8,
because i think we would ultimately want the flexibility to be able to run
both core and example tests with
any of (jetty6, jetty7, jetty8, tomcat-xx, ...), and this could be specified
with a -D or something.
Perhaps the defaults are set to something like you suggest, but hudson could
test other possibilities.
> Capture Logging Events from JUL and Log4j
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3358
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3358
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Ryan McKinley
> Assignee: Ryan McKinley
> Attachments: SOLR-3358-compile-path.patch, SOLR-3358-logging.patch,
> SOLR-3358-logging.patch
>
>
> The UI should be able to show the last few log messages. To support this, we
> will need to register an Appender (log4j) or Handler
> (JUL) and keep a buffer of recent log events.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
