I have not checked this, but if the JavaDB is in the JDK official JavaDocs and is therefore part of JDK6 spec? We have to check this, but *if* the package names start with java.db or whatever it *has* to be also in alternate JDK impls. At least OpenJDK also downloads derby while building.
----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 8:42 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Help: SOLR-3430 and Build changes > > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > > One note: > > > > Derby is included since JDK 6 as "JavaDB" together with the JDK: > > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javadb/overview/index.html > > > > As Lucene/Solr 4 will be using JDK 6 as minimum requirement (in contrast) to > Solr 3.x (which was JDK 5), can we not simply rely on this version shipped > with > JDK? That would make life easy. And for simple tests that version should be > enough... > > > > But we dont require *oracle*s implementation as a minimum requirement. > we also support IBM etc too? > > -- > lucidimagination.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional > commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
