[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13269710#comment-13269710
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-3442:
------------------------------------
bq. I would cringe a little if we change the schema so that it doesn't work
very well if the user does drop back to the lucene query parser
The lucene query parser generally shouldn't be used for user queries, only
programmatically generated ones. Using expicit fieldnames (or specifying df)
for that case should be fine.
> Example schema switch to DisMax instead of CopyField
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3442
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3442
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Schema and Analysis
> Reporter: Jan Høydahl
> Labels: dismax
>
> Spinoff from SOLR-3439:
> The use of copyField in todays example schema is an anti pattern since we
> indirectly teach people to duplicate most of their content, while most would
> be better off using DisMax, or at least a combination.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
