[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13269951#comment-13269951
]
Jack Krupansky edited comment on LUCENE-4024 at 5/7/12 8:07 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
I updated svn and see the Javadoc now. A notation in CHANGES.txt would be nice
too since this is a user-visiable issue. Should there be a separate issue to
update doc for the query parser(s) beyond Lucene (I see that Lucene Query
Parser is updated)?
was (Author: jkrupan):
I updated svn and see the Javadoc now. A notation in CHANGES.txt would be
nice too since this is a user-visiable issue. Should there be a separate issue
to update doc for the query parser(s)?
> FuzzyQuery should never do edit distance > 2
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4024
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4024
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-4024.patch
>
>
> Edit distance 1 and 2 are now very very fast compared to 3.x (100X-200X
> faster) ... but edit distance 3 will fallback to the super-slow scan all
> terms in 3.x, which is not graceful degradation.
> Not sure how to fix it ... mabye we have a SlowFuzzyQuery? And FuzzyQuery
> throws exc if you try to ask it to be slow? Or, we add boolean (off by
> default) that you must turn on to allow slow one..?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
