On May 19, 2012, at 5:55 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:

> A *long* time ago we discussed converting to confluence to replace the
> forest site.  The key issue was that only commiters could have access
> if we want to include the generated PDF in the distribution.  This is
> all moot now that we have ditched forest.
> 
> Since then the discussion has come up and I think everyone is in favor
> of the idea, but noone has taken the steps to make it happen.  I
> suggest we:
> 
> 1. Create infra JIRA issue to:
> * delete the old https://cwiki.apache.org/SOLRxSITE/  test
> * create https://cwiki.apache.org/SOLR
> * create https://cwiki.apache.org/LUCENE

+1


> 
> 2. Convert existing sites using
> https://studio.plugins.atlassian.com/wiki/display/UWC/UWC+MoinMoin+Notes
> I don't know if this is something we can do, or we can make an infra
> JIRA issue for

I'd actually argue we skip this, kind of.  I'd like to see us have a left hand 
nav that represents the versions and then we copy the docs into each version 
and then go through and make sure everything jives per version.  While this is 
more work up front, I think in the long run, it will result in a much better 
experience for our users.

> 
> 3. replace existing MoinMoin sites with links to cwiki
> https://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/
> https://wiki.apache.org/solr/
> 
> 
> ryan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Mark Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I know there was a long debate about wiki software and docs and what not. It 
>> got long enough that I petered out on it.
>> 
>> In some ways, I guess this is a lazy plea for someone that did follow along 
>> to summarize. Did we get anywhere? Is there an action item to start on?
>> 
>> I'm in the same spot I was when I started that thread - the first bite I'm 
>> after is switching from the dated moin moin to the modern confluence. It 
>> seems as easy as opening a JIRA issue to get a confluence space up.
>> 
>> Should we just do that and start migrating, and take further leaps from 
>> there?
>> 
>> Or is there some fallout from the previous debate that should be 
>> incorporated into the next move?
>> 
>> - Mark Miller
>> lucidimagination.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 

--------------------------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com



Reply via email to