On 06/06/2012 00:40, Robert Muir wrote:
Hello,
Currently we do this in CHANGES.txt:
LUCENE-XXXX:
Fixed a horrible nasty bug. (Joe Contributor via John Doe Committer)
I propose we remove "via<committers name>" from CHANGES.txt. I don't
think any users care about who committed changes and I think it
de-emphasizes the actual contributor. If we need to know who committed
something we can find this in SVN logs or on the jira issue.
Opinions?
-1 for pretty much the same reasons as Mark and Eric listed - some work
is required even for trivial patches, and it also helps to quickly see
which committer was involved in reviewing and signing-off on an issue
(not always obvious from JIRA).
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki
http://www.sigram.com, blog http://www.sigram.com/blog
___.,___,___,___,_._. __________________<><____________________
[___||.__|__/|__||\/|: Information Retrieval, System Integration
___|||__||..\|..||..|: Contact: info at sigram dot com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
