[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13291850#comment-13291850
 ] 

Han Jiang commented on LUCENE-3892:
-----------------------------------

OK, here is a result I tried to reproduce with Mike's test script:
Indexing time:
    trunk: 2396 sec
    patch: 2793 sec

Searching time:
{noformat}
          TaskQPS Lucene40StdDev Lucene40    QPS PFor StdDev PFor      Pct diff
          AndHighMed       22.76        0.54       14.68        1.00  -41% -  
-29%
        SloppyPhrase        3.58        0.17        2.46        0.27  -41% -  
-19%
            SpanNear        5.90        0.09        4.08        0.37  -38% -  
-23%
         AndHighHigh       10.00        0.17        8.08        0.57  -26% -  
-11%
              Phrase        1.68        0.07        1.45        0.17  -27% -    
0%
             Respell       37.65        0.74       33.41        1.04  -15% -   
-6%
              Fuzzy1       38.00        1.60       34.37        1.06  -15% -   
-2%
              IntNRQ        4.27        0.33        3.87        0.19  -19% -    
3%
              Fuzzy2       16.35        0.60       15.02        0.31  -13% -   
-2%
            Wildcard       30.24        0.57       28.24        1.85  -14% -    
1%
            PKLookup       85.82        5.04       83.25        2.81  -11% -    
6%
             Prefix3       19.20        0.40       19.19        1.46   -9% -    
9%
           OrHighMed        9.25        0.59        9.41        0.70  -11% -   
16%
         TermGroup1M       11.46        0.62       11.74        0.81   -9% -   
15%
          OrHighHigh        3.15        0.17        3.28        0.23   -8% -   
17%
      TermBGroup1M1P       19.28        0.38       20.32        1.14   -2% -   
13%
        TermBGroup1M        6.23        0.21        6.71        0.46   -3% -   
19%
                Term       30.86        1.52       34.34        3.26   -4% -   
28%
{noformat}

It is done on a 64bit AMD server with Java 1.7.0.
                
> Add a useful intblock postings format (eg, FOR, PFOR, PFORDelta, 
> Simple9/16/64, etc.)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3892
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3892
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>              Labels: gsoc2012, lucene-gsoc-12
>             Fix For: 4.1
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3892_pfor.patch, LUCENE-3892_pfor.patch, 
> LUCENE-3892_settings.patch, LUCENE-3892_settings.patch
>
>
> On the flex branch we explored a number of possible intblock
> encodings, but for whatever reason never brought them to completion.
> There are still a number of issues opened with patches in different
> states.
> Initial results (based on prototype) were excellent (see
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2010/08/lucene-performance-with-pfordelta-codec.html
> ).
> I think this would make a good GSoC project.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to