I assumed using the queries module, which isn't in 3.x. After a look at the 3.x codebase this doesn't seem to be a problem. Since all the classes you need are in: o.a.l.search.function package inside core Lucene. You can use the CustomScoreQuery & ValueSourceQuery instead of the BoostedQuery.
Martijn On 12 June 2012 21:24, corwin <rechter...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's a good idea, thanks for the tip Martijn. I'm not a fan of performing > an extra search, but it does seem like it's unavoidable for this scenario. > > We are currently working with Lucene 3.5 and you mentioned that it assumes > Lucene 4 or 3.6. Any particular reason for that? I prefer not upgrading just > yet unless there's a feature that will specifically help me accomplish this. > > Thanks again, > > Corwin. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Grouping-Boosting-large-groups-tp3988959p3989266.html > Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > -- Met vriendelijke groet, Martijn van Groningen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
