[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13397425#comment-13397425
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4069:
--------------------------------------------

Hmm somehow I messed up when testing the bloom postings format: all of my 
on-disk bloom bits sets are 8 MB, regardless of the size of the segment... so 
something is wrong (I would expect segments w/ more terms to have a larger bit 
set...).  This is what I did for the codec:
{noformat}
    final Codec codec = new Lucene40Codec() {
      @Override
      public PostingsFormat getPostingsFormatForField(String field) {
        final String pfName = field.equals("id") ? idFieldPostingsFormat : 
defaultPostingsFormat;
        if (pfName.equals("Bloom")) {
          return new 
BloomFilteringPostingsFormat(PostingsFormat.forName("Lucene40"),
                                                  new BloomFilterFactory() {
                                                    @Override
                                                    public FuzzySet 
getSetForField(FieldInfo info) {    
                                                      return 
FuzzySet.createSetBasedOnMaxMemory(100*1024*1024, new MurmurHash2());
                                                    }
                                                  });
        } else {
          return PostingsFormat.forName(pfName);
        }
      }
    };
{noformat}

I thought that would use plenty of RAM (100 MB), and then downsize to the 
appropriately sized bit set (~10% saturation) when writing ... but somehow it 
didn't.
                
> Segment-level Bloom filters for a 2 x speed up on rare term searches
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4069
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4069
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core/index
>    Affects Versions: 3.6, 4.0
>            Reporter: Mark Harwood
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.0, 3.6.1
>
>         Attachments: BloomFilterPostingsBranch4x.patch, 
> MHBloomFilterOn3.6Branch.patch, PrimaryKeyPerfTest40.java
>
>
> An addition to each segment which stores a Bloom filter for selected fields 
> in order to give fast-fail to term searches, helping avoid wasted disk access.
> Best suited for low-frequency fields e.g. primary keys on big indexes with 
> many segments but also speeds up general searching in my tests.
> Overview slideshow here: 
> http://www.slideshare.net/MarkHarwood/lucene-bloomfilteredsegments
> Benchmarks based on Wikipedia content here: http://goo.gl/X7QqU
> Patch based on 3.6 codebase attached.
> There are no 3.6 API changes currently - to play just add a field with "_blm" 
> on the end of the name to invoke special indexing/querying capability. 
> Clearly a new Field or schema declaration(!) would need adding to APIs to 
> configure the service properly.
> Also, a patch for Lucene4.0 codebase introducing a new PostingsFormat

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to