[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403004#comment-13403004
 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4160:
-------------------------------------

What is the use case of the min/maxfailures (besides just your idea of a 
fastfail boolean, which I liked)
                
> Bring back the functional equivalent of tests.iters.min
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4160
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4160
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: general/test
>            Reporter: Dawid Weiss
>            Assignee: Dawid Weiss
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 5.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-4160.patch
>
>
> What is needed is effectively saying: "repeat this test N times, but stop 
> once you hit a failure".
> Previously it was "tests.iters.min=X" which is (still) kind of confusing to 
> me because I don't understand how "X" is related to the original question.
> I propose to implement a boolean "tests.fastfail" which would ignore any 
> tests running on the same JVM after the first failure has been hit.
> Those with fond memories of "tests.iters.min" speak up, please.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to