[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4179:
--------------------------------
Attachment: LUCENE-4179.patch
patch (passes test, but not benchmarked).
i still dont like that we are making the suffix lengths larger by stealing bits
for leaf/non-leaf, and we can maybe cleanup a few other things.
but first we should make sure its smaller and just as fast, or faster and not
larger :)
> bulk-compress blocktree term suffix lengths
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4179
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4179
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Attachments: LUCENE-4179.patch
>
>
> these should be fairly tiny numbers, it seems wasteful to use a byte-per-term
> when they typically only need a few bits.
> also if we have them in bulk, its a step towards random access.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
