I can understand these quotes. what's the conclusion from your communication?

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Dawid Weiss
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I've repeated Sebastiano's experiments (and so did he). A few quotes
> from the communication.
>
>> The index appears to be larger now--43.1GB. Probably they have better 
>> skipping structures that take more space.
>>
>> From what I can see the format is the same as before--the .frq file contains 
>> document pointers and positions. So my SearchFiles class still reads 
>> documents *and* counts.
>>
>> But the most interesting part I've read in a blog is that now Lucene has a 
>> pluggable index format. This means that someone can actually write a QS 
>> index for Lucene and test what happens in production. That's a most 
>> interesting change!
>
> and:
>
>> Well, they made a great job:
>>
>> trec-40-text    unscored        terms   result: 5511    494901
>> trec-40-text    unscored        and     result: 2193 769110
>> trec-40-text    unscored        phrase  result: 6615 148663
>> trec-40-text    unscored        spans   result: 12407 545090
>>
>> So conjunction is still better, but by a really smaller margin. The worst 
>> part is term scanning--they are now significantly faster than QS indices.
>
> Dawid
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Dawid Weiss
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Fyi. I contacted Sebastiano and will get hold of the data set and
>> benchmarks he used to repeat his experiment with current trunk
>> (curiosity). Any hints on which configuration should be used will be
>> welcome.
>>
>> Dawid
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Li Li <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> http://mg4j.di.unimi.it/
>>> http://vigna.di.unimi.it/papers.php#VigQSI
>>>
>>> sounds very interesting and attractive.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to