On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Maybe Dawid has some insight into why this parameterized test gets >>> such a long name and if there is a way we can work around it? > > Sorry, I was out. I don't know how this is related to the output files > but parameterized tests do contain their parameters in their > description (name) so .toString should return a sensible value for the > test description. Also see this example for @Name annotation which can > be used to name parameters for clarity: >
I committed a workaround (not wanting to change non-test code for clover), that boxes the param in a holder object with a simple toString. lets see if the build succeeds tonight. -- lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
