[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13415767#comment-13415767
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-3619:
-----------------------------------
Mark. I agree that for simple DB like searches you can do almost everything
using example schema with dynamic fields. And if you don't care about building
a great search experience, you can also do anything with the example schema -
just throw some data at it, query and hey I get results!! :) In the >100
enterprise search customer deployments I have done, there has always been
business requirements involved calling for adjusting the schema. Often for
simple things like indexing an Author field which should be searchable analyzed
with phonetics and also should be a facet.
I'd love for us to make Solr more and more light weight in terms of
configuration. Letting things just work the way you'd expect. Perhaps we one
day can offer users to use Solr in schema-less mode if they wish to - in the
sense that you can mix and match pre-defined fieldTypes with ad-hoc ones. And
that Solr figures out the optimal cache and warming settings automagically etc.
> Rename 'example' dir to 'server' and pull examples into an 'examples'
> directory
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3619
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3619
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Mark Miller
> Fix For: 4.0, 5.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-3619.patch, server-name-layout.png
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
