[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13425853#comment-13425853
]
Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-3580:
--------------------------------------
I'm okay with the proposal for "supportedLowercaseOperators", but I would make
two points:
1. What about mixed case? Would mixed case And/Or/Not be treated as lower case?
Or only strict lower case?
2. How about a revised compromise - Keep "lowercaseOperators=true/false" as is
for compatibility, but also support the same parameter name with the form
"lowercaseOperators=and,or,not" to provide the desired flexibility. All the
benefit of the current proposal, but without the need to switch/deprecate the
old form.
> In ExtendedDismax, lowercase 'not' operator is not being treated as an
> operator when 'lowercaseOperators' is enabled
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3580
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3580
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: query parsers
> Affects Versions: 4.0-ALPHA
> Reporter: Michael Dodsworth
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-3580-proposal.patch, SOLR-3580.patch
>
>
> When lowercase operator support is enabled (for edismax), the lowercase 'not'
> operator is being wrongly treated as a literal term (and not as an operator).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
