And its worse: this method returns int, while Terms.size() returns long!

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [email protected]


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 11:52 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: svn commit: r1374647 - in /lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x: ./
> lucene/ lucene/test-framework/ lucene/test-
> framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/FieldFilterAtomicReader.java
> 
> I checked again:
> 
>   /** Returns the number of terms for all fields, or -1 if this
>    *  measure isn't stored by the codec. Note that, just like
>    *  other term measures, this measure does not take deleted
>    *  documents into account. */
>   public abstract int size() throws IOException;
> 
> So this method is returning nonsense. Should return -1, as we don't know
this
> information, right?
> 
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: [email protected]
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 11:27 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: svn commit: r1374647 - in /lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x:
> > ./ lucene/ lucene/test-framework/ lucene/test-
> > framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/FieldFilterAtomicReader.jav
> > a
> >
> > No problem, I wrote the original code, so I was fixing it in parallel!
> Sorry for
> > changing your fix :-)
> >
> > We should maybe improve the iterator at all (the StoredFields branch
> > has a FilterIterator already, which just has a matches() method) and
> > make the
> whole
> > class available outside of tests? Its as useful as the other
> > FilterReaders
> in
> > contrib/misc. You can use it to split an index vertically (remove
> > fields
> from an
> > index by the usual IW.addIndexes(new
> > FieldFilterAtomicReader(...))
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> > -----
> > Uwe Schindler
> > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> > http://www.thetaphi.de
> > eMail: [email protected]
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Michael McCandless [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 11:22 PM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1374647 - in /lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x:
> > > ./ lucene/ lucene/test-framework/ lucene/test-
> > > framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/FieldFilterAtomicReader.j
> > > av
> > > a
> > >
> > > Woops, thanks Uwe!
> > >
> > > Mike McCandless
> > >
> > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> > >
> > > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 3:56 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Author: uschindler
> > > > Date: Sat Aug 18 19:56:33 2012
> > > > New Revision: 1374647
> > > >
> > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1374647&view=rev
> > > > Log:
> > > > Merged revision(s) 1374646 from lucene/dev/trunk:
> > > > 2nd fix: The same problem had size()
> > > >
> > > > Modified:
> > > >     lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/   (props changed)
> > > >     lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/lucene/   (props changed)
> > > >     lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/lucene/test-framework/   (props
> > changed)
> > > >
> > > > lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/a
> > > > pa ch e/lucene/index/FieldFilterAtomicReader.java
> > > >
> > > > Modified:
> > > > lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/a
> > > > pa ch e/lucene/index/FieldFilterAtomicReader.java
> > > > URL:
> > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/lucene/
> > > > te
> > > > st
> > > > -framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/FieldFilterAtomicReader.
> > > > ja va?rev=1374647&r1=1374646&r2=1374647&view=diff
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ================================================================
> > > ======
> > > > ========
> > > > ---
> > > > lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/a
> > > > pa ch e/lucene/index/FieldFilterAtomicReader.java (original)
> > > > +++ lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/lucene/test-framework/src/java/o
> > > > +++ rg /a pache/lucene/index/FieldFilterAtomicReader.java Sat Aug
> > > > +++ 18
> > > > +++ 19:56:33 2012
> > > > @@ -64,11 +64,7 @@ public final class FieldFilterAtomicRead
> > > >      f = new FieldFilterFields(f);
> > > >      // we need to check for emptyness, so we can return
> > > >      // null:
> > > > -    if (f.iterator().hasNext()) {
> > > > -      return f;
> > > > -    } else {
> > > > -      return null;
> > > > -    }
> > > > +    return f.iterator().hasNext() ? f : null;
> > > >    }
> > > >
> > > >    @Override
> > > > @@ -146,7 +142,8 @@ public final class FieldFilterAtomicRead
> > > >        // TODO: add faster implementation!
> > > >        int c = 0;
> > > >        final Iterator<String> it = iterator();
> > > > -      while (it.next() != null) {
> > > > +      while (it.hasNext()) {
> > > > +        it.next();
> > > >          c++;
> > > >        }
> > > >        return c;
> > > > @@ -156,7 +153,7 @@ public final class FieldFilterAtomicRead
> > > >      public Iterator<String> iterator() {
> > > >        final Iterator<String> in = super.iterator();
> > > >        return new Iterator<String>() {
> > > > -        String cached = null;
> > > > +        private String cached = null;
> > > >
> > > >          @Override
> > > >          public String next() {
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For
> > > additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For
> > additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional
> commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to