I'll fix, it's a probabilistic test and (I thought) well below what's
possible but this particular seed exceeds it.

By the way --

> [junit4:junit4] JVM J0:     1.48 ..   168.78 =   167.31s
> [junit4:junit4] JVM J1:     1.47 ..   168.25 =   166.78s
> [junit4:junit4] JVM J2:     1.48 ..   168.52 =   167.04s
> [junit4:junit4] JVM J3:     1.48 ..   168.81 =   167.33s
> [junit4:junit4] JVM J4:     1.49 ..   172.04 =   170.55s
> [junit4:junit4] JVM J5:     1.49 ..   168.61 =   167.12s
> [junit4:junit4] JVM J6:     1.26 ..   168.79 =   167.53s
> [junit4:junit4] JVM J7:     1.49 ..   168.80 =   167.31s
> [junit4:junit4] Execution time total: 2 minutes 52 seconds
> [junit4:junit4] Tests summary: 312 suites, 1773 tests, 1 failure, 18 ignored 
> (10 assumptions)

Nice machine you got there, Simon! Very pretty load-balancing times :)

Dawid

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to