[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13452166#comment-13452166
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-4371:
---------------------------------------
+1 to rermove the slicer! I was thinking about that the whole time and it
really makes it easier.
In general for 4.0, we should make the slice method abstract and *not* provide
a default implementation. In most cases its as easy to implement like clone().
> consider refactoring slicer to indexinput.slice
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4371
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4371
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Attachments: LUCENE-4371.patch
>
>
> From LUCENE-4364:
> {quote}
> In my opinion, we should maybe check, if we can remove the whole Slicer in
> all Indexinputs? Just make the slice(...) method return the current
> BufferedIndexInput-based one. This could be another issue, once this is in.
> {quote}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
