[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2723.
----------------------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
We nuked the low level bulk postings API... and BlockPostingsFormat now does
bulk reads under the hood and gives great performance ...
> Speed up Lucene's low level bulk postings read API
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2723
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2723
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/index
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 4.1
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2723-BulkEnumWrapper.patch,
> LUCENE-2723_bulkvint.patch, LUCENE-2723_facetPerSeg.patch,
> LUCENE-2723_facetPerSeg.patch, LUCENE-2723_openEnum.patch, LUCENE-2723.patch,
> LUCENE-2723.patch, LUCENE-2723.patch, LUCENE-2723.patch, LUCENE-2723.patch,
> LUCENE-2723.patch, LUCENE-2723_termscorer.patch,
> LUCENE-2723-termscorer.patch, LUCENE-2723-termscorer.patch,
> LUCENE-2723-termscorer.patch, LUCENE-2723_wastedint.patch
>
>
> Spinoff from LUCENE-1410.
> The flex DocsEnum has a simple bulk-read API that reads the next chunk
> of docs/freqs. But it's a poor fit for intblock codecs like FOR/PFOR
> (from LUCENE-1410). This is not unlike sucking coffee through those
> tiny plastic coffee stirrers they hand out airplanes that,
> surprisingly, also happen to function as a straw.
> As a result we see no perf gain from using FOR/PFOR.
> I had hacked up a fix for this, described at in my blog post at
> http://chbits.blogspot.com/2010/08/lucene-performance-with-pfordelta-codec.html
> I'm opening this issue to get that work to a committable point.
> So... I've worked out a new bulk-read API to address performance
> bottleneck. It has some big changes over the current bulk-read API:
> * You can now also bulk-read positions (but not payloads), but, I
> have yet to cutover positional queries.
> * The buffer contains doc deltas, not absolute values, for docIDs
> and positions (freqs are absolute).
> * Deleted docs are not filtered out.
> * The doc & freq buffers need not be "aligned". For fixed intblock
> codecs (FOR/PFOR) they will be, but for varint codecs (Simple9/16,
> Group varint, etc.) they won't be.
> It's still a work in progress...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
