[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Adrien Grand resolved SOLR-3830. -------------------------------- Resolution: Won't Fix Given that we can neither rename LFUCache to FastLFUCache nor rename FastLRUCache to something else, I am marking this issue as won't fix since there is no way to have a consistent name for these two classes. > Rename LFUCache to FastLFUCache > ------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-3830 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3830 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 4.0-BETA > Reporter: Adrien Grand > Priority: Minor > > I find it a little disturbing that LFUCache shares most of its behavior (not > strictly bounded size, good at concurrent reads, slow at writes unless > eviction is performed in a separate thread) with FastLRUCache while it sounds > like it is the LFU equivalent of LRUCache (strictly bounded size, > synchronized reads, fast writes) so I'd like to rename it to FastLFUCache. > Maybe we should also rename these Fast*Cache to Concurrent*Cache so that > people don't think that they are better than their non Fast alternatives in > every way. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org