[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13457556#comment-13457556
 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3842:
-------------------------------------

and as far as exactFirst: lets just keep it simple and have it as a surface 
form comparison?

This is really what I think most people will expect anyway: in the case of 
"duplicates" and exactFirst,
nobody really cares nor sees the underlying analyzed form.

So I don't think we should have multiple outputs for the FST here.
                
> Analyzing Suggester
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3842
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3842
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: modules/spellchecker
>    Affects Versions: 3.6, 4.0-ALPHA
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, 
> LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, 
> LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, 
> LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, 
> LUCENE-3842-TokenStream_to_Automaton.patch
>
>
> Since we added shortest-path wFSA search in LUCENE-3714, and generified the 
> comparator in LUCENE-3801,
> I think we should look at implementing suggesters that have more capabilities 
> than just basic prefix matching.
> In particular I think the most flexible approach is to integrate with 
> Analyzer at both build and query time,
> such that we build a wFST with:
> input: analyzed text such as ghost0christmas0past <-- byte 0 here is an 
> optional token separator
> output: surface form such as "the ghost of christmas past"
> weight: the weight of the suggestion
> we make an FST with PairOutputs<weight,output>, but only do the shortest path 
> operation on the weight side (like
> the test in LUCENE-3801), at the same time accumulating the output (surface 
> form), which will be the actual suggestion.
> This allows a lot of flexibility:
> * Using even standardanalyzer means you can offer suggestions that ignore 
> stopwords, e.g. if you type in "ghost of chr...",
>   it will suggest "the ghost of christmas past"
> * we can add support for synonyms/wdf/etc at both index and query time (there 
> are tradeoffs here, and this is not implemented!)
> * this is a basis for more complicated suggesters such as Japanese 
> suggesters, where the analyzed form is in fact the reading,
>   so we would add a TokenFilter that copies ReadingAttribute into term text 
> to support that...
> * other general things like offering suggestions that are more "fuzzy" like 
> using a plural stemmer or ignoring accents or whatever.
> According to my benchmarks, suggestions are still very fast with the 
> prototype (e.g. ~ 100,000 QPS), and the FST size does not
> explode (its short of twice that of a regular wFST, but this is still far 
> smaller than TST or JaSpell, etc).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to