[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13459702#comment-13459702
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4410:
--------------------------------------------
I think we should target 4.1 for this? Ie commit to trunk, let it back, ship
4.0, backport.
> Make FilteredQuery more flexible with regards to how filters are applied
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4410
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4410
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/search
> Affects Versions: 4.0-BETA
> Reporter: Simon Willnauer
> Fix For: 5.0, 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-4410.patch, LUCENE-4410.patch, LUCENE-4410.patch
>
>
> Currently FilteredQuery uses either the "old" lucene 3 leap frog approach or
> pushes the filter down together with accepted docs. Yet there might be more
> strategies required to fit common usecases like geo-filtering where a rather
> costly function is applied to each document. Using leap frog this might
> result in a very slow query if the filter is advanced since it might have
> linear running time to find the next valid document. We should be more
> flexible with regards to those usecases and make it possible to either tell
> FQ what to do or plug in a strategy that applied a filter in a different way.
> The current FQ impl also uses an heuristic to decide if RA or LeapFrog should
> be used. This is really an implementation detail of the strategy and not of
> FQ and should be moved out.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
