Then we should nuke it. The commits are not lost, you can always look at them after deletion. Just open your repository browser and enter an older revision number! I just don’t want to make the "play-around" branches be first-class citicens of the Lucene / Solr repository.
----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [email protected] > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Muir [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 6:14 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1393408 - in /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene: ./ > codecs/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/simpletext/ > core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ > core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/ > core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/codecs/perfield/ core/src/te > > I created a patch because the branch had lots of back-and-forth (essentially > noise) from mike and I. > > We also dont move anything around or anyting like that (its just fixing > bugs/tests really) so a patch to me made more sense... > > The branch was just so we could easily collaborate and set my jenkins on it, > etc, > etc. > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: > > Why did you not merge-reintegrate? > > > > ----- > > Uwe Schindler > > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > > http://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: [email protected] > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 6:04 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1393408 - in /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene: ./ > >> codecs/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/simpletext/ > >> core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ > >> core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/ > >> core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/codecs/perfield/ core/src/te > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Yes :) > >> > It is still there and can be viewed (using @rev in URL), but it > >> > should not be > >> visible as "active". We already have way too many branches, which > >> seem to be dead, we should cleanup. > >> > >> Hmm, though, I'm nervous destroying commit history ... I don't think > >> in this case it'd be useful ... but maybe it could be? > >> > >> I don't think we have THAT many branches :) > >> > >> Mike McCandless > >> > >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For > >> additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For > > additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional > commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
