[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13472429#comment-13472429
]
Rodrigo Vega commented on LUCENE-4461:
--------------------------------------
Yes, I know that but i need a generic way to handle the facet requests during
search preparation stage. For that reason I have a FacetParams object with the
following properties: int limit, String[] path, boolean filter
Then I can have some peace of code like this:
{code}
// Query is a bean that wraps a lucene query just to make easy the integration
with our UI. REal lucene query is // handle by "q"
if (query.isFaceted())
for (FacetParams facet : query.getFacet()) {
CategoryPath c = new CategoryPath(facet.getPath());
facetSearchParams.addFacetRequest(new CountFacetRequest(c,
facet.getLimit()));
if (facet.isFilter())
q = DrillDown.query(q, c);
}
... preapre collectors and finally search
{code}
This is because the user can create its own query using some kind of wizard. So
I have two options:
* Support this feature
* Avoid configurations with this kind of cases.
It is not a really big problem it is mostly about how to keep my code as neat
as I can :) . I can't ask you to solve my code issues :D
> Multiple FacetRequest with the same path creates inconsistent results
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4461
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4461
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: modules/facet
> Affects Versions: 3.6
> Reporter: Rodrigo Vega
> Labels: facet, faceted-search
> Attachments: LuceneFacetTest.java
>
>
> Multiple FacetRequest are getting merged into one creating wrong results in
> this case:
> FacetSearchParams facetSearchParams = new FacetSearchParams();
> facetSearchParams.addFacetRequest(new CountFacetRequest(new
> CategoryPath("author"), 10));
> facetSearchParams.addFacetRequest(new CountFacetRequest(new
> CategoryPath("author"), 10));
> Problem can be fixed by defining hashcode and equals in certain way that
> Lucene recognize we are talking about different requests.
> Attached test case.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]