[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13476400#comment-13476400
 ] 

Mark Miller commented on SOLR-3939:
-----------------------------------

interesting - I can see an issue when I run the test with empty indexes, but my 
current test is passing if I add some docs. The main reason I see for this at 
the moment is that a leader who tries to sync with his replicas will always 
fail with an empty tlog (no frame of reference).

I'll have to dig deeper for the 'docs in index' case.
                
> Solr Cloud recovery and leader election when unloading leader core
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-3939
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3939
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SolrCloud
>    Affects Versions: 4.0-BETA, 4.0
>            Reporter: Joel Bernstein
>            Assignee: Mark Miller
>              Labels: 4.0.1_Candidate
>             Fix For: 4.1, 5.0
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-3939.patch
>
>
> When a leader core is unloaded using the core admin api, the followers in the 
> shard go into recovery but do not come out. Leader election doesn't take 
> place and the shard goes down.
> This effects the ability to move a micro-shard from one Solr instance to 
> another Solr instance.
> The problem does not occur 100% of the time but a large % of the time. 
> To setup a test, startup Solr Cloud with a single shard. Add cores to that 
> shard as replicas using core admin. Then unload the leader core using core 
> admin. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to