[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13484973#comment-13484973
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4508:
-------------------------------------
That may be, but i think thats still atypical.
Why not just add this "null" or "no" implementation to give these people the
choice?
This is a great example of where flexible indexing wins out, its very tricky to
incorporate this kinda stuff into a one-size-fits-all format.
Instead we can just provide alternatives.
Think about bulk merge and only having one doc with stored fields, then that
doc getting deleted, and all those kinda cases.
> Stored fields should require as little resources as possible when no field is
> stored
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4508
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4508
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.1
>
>
> Currently, stored fields may require a non-negligible amount of memory and/or
> disk space even if no field is actually stored. We should find a way to
> reduce these requirements.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
